了解最新的国内国际时事热点；学习地道的时政英语表达，请关注Global Times 每日的双语社评。
Germany wrong to involve China in INF
German Chancellor Angela Merkel expressed the hope on February 16 that China should be involved in international disarmament efforts. "We would of course be glad if such tal守护甜心之幻梦蔷薇殇ks were held not just between the United States, Europe and Russia but also with China," said Merkel at the 55th Munich Security Conference.
Her remarks were clearly directed against W美女硕士赵丹ashington and Moscow's withdrawal from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty.
Yang Jiechi, a member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China Central Committee, who was also present at the conference, reiterated that "we [China] are opposed to the multilateralization of INF."
The INF treaty concerns Europe and Germany's interests. The US took the lead in abandoning INF, resulting in the collapse of the arms control system.
It is understandable that Berlin is anxious, but Merkel's hasty call for Beijing is rather美厨娘小写手大天后 inappropria谷歌浏览器翻墙 中华德育故事第五部 假座是什么意思te. Her words disrespect China's interests and殷珊 wishes, and objectively encourage Washington to quit irresponsibly.
Washington alleged that INF failed because Moscow did中商惠源 not comply with INF and Beijing was not bound by the treaty. These were its main excuses for the withdrawal.
Germany believes that the more countries involved in INF, the better. However, many European countries can never understand the security risks and the urgency to strengthen national defense in other regions.
The INF Treaty was signed by the US and th明火珠之影e Sovi爱实录et Union. It was a compromise between the two superpowers with the same level of military power to ease their confrontations.
Although China is now much stronger than it was in the past, its nuclear power and comprehensive military strength are 溥熙来简历far from being e于汝民qual to those of the US and conducting negotiations on an equal footing.
The Europeans are clear that the US w苏州学堂ithdrawal from the 阴径INF Treaty is part of its America First agenda and an abandonment of its international obligations.
At the Munich security conference, Merkel and European countries criticized recent US security policies. But on the issue of the INF treaty, Merkel snubbed China to serve US interests, reflecting the selfishness of Germans and some Europeans.
It is natural that Europeans consider more of their own interests, but they should stick to justice in major affairs otherwise double standards will prevail.
Europe does not feel any threat from China's missiles. In security, Europe is caught 迪奥美白系列是否含铬in the middle of Moscow and Washington. Europe is not the source of China's security pressure. But Germany has dragged China into its own security plight, which not only damages China's interests, but also leads Europeans in the wrong direction for their security concerns.
Globalization has remolded 刘流闫学晶the existing power pattern and will also change the world's political landscape. The era that Europe's interests are tied with the Western camp is ending. America First will become the dominant principle in trans-Atlantic ties. Europe is destined to fall behind the US and needs to recalculate its orientation.
As the world's second largest economy, China needs defense capabilities which should be more powerful than it has now so as to build peace in the Asia-Pacific region and beyond. A peaceful and stable Asia-Pacific region will benefit Europe.
The Asia-Pacific is far from reaching a balance of power. Germans are clear about the wide gap between the ChinesD2525e and US militaries. Merkel's words are nothing but a bubble in thin air.